need proof in turnitin PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING REFLECTION PAPER The purpose of this paper

need proof in turnitin

PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING REFLECTION PAPER
The purpose of this paper is to define, describe and explain your personal beliefs about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their inter-relationship to one another as they guide your current nursing practice. There are no right or wrong thoughts, feelings or beliefs; these represent your own philosophical beliefs. Then you must correlate or link your current philosophy to one particular nursing theory, identify these. The reflection paper is to write in MS Word, be typed according to APA format and must be 3 pages in length. The paper should include a title page and reference page, however, these pages are not to be included in the final count. Evaluation criteria are as follows:
Criteria for Personal Philosophy of Nursing Reflection Paper:
– Introduction & brief description identifies the purpose of the paper and the factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy. 4 points
– Define, describe and explain your personal thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the concepts of the 4 nursing metaparadigms: 8 points
– Person/client
– Environment
– Health
– Nursing
– Identification and a brief description of the nursing theory found to be the most compatible with the students personal nursing philosophy. Discuss the core components of the theory and how it reflects the student’s personal philosophies. 3 points
– Organization, documentation, references followed APA format. 5 points
Writing Assignment Rubric

A (15)
B (13)
C (11)
D/F (8)
Score
Focus:
Purpose
Purpose is
clear
Shows
awareness of purpose
Shows limited
awareness of purpose
No awareness

Main idea
Clearly presents
the main idea and supports it throughout the paper.
There is a
main idea supported throughout most of the paper.
The vague
sense of the main idea weakly supported throughout the paper.
No main idea

Organization:
Overall
Well-planned
and well thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea,
transitions and conclusion.
Good overall
organization includes the main organizational tools.
There is a
sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used
weakly or missing
No sense of
organization

Content
Exceptionally
well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well developed, supported with
specific evidence &
facts, as well
as examples and specific details.
Well-presented
and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and
details, mostly specific.
Content is
sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or
supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.
Content is not
sound

Research (if
assignment includes a research component)
Sources are
exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper
very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources are
well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional
errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources
support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well
within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
The paper does
not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well.
They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on
the Works
Cited page.

Grammar &
Mechanics
Excellent
grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
A few errors
in grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation, but not many.
Shows a
pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. It could also be a sign of a lack of
proof-reading.
Continuous
errors

APA
Guidelines
Uses APA
guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources and formatting
Uses APA
guidelines
with minor violations to cite sources and formatting
Reflects
incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines
It does not
use APA guidelines.


Total