HC 450 Herzing University Create the Ehr Vision5-B Identify the Planning Horizon Other

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

  • Review the information provided for an example EHR implementation, including each activity’s duration and predecessor(s):
Activity Duration (days) Predecessor
A Create the EHR vision 5
B Identify the planning horizon 10 A
C Obtain buy-in from affected parties 30 B
D Develop a financing and acquisition strategy 10 C
E Develop functional, data, and technical strategies 45 C
F Conduct vendor selection 45 D, E
G Plan the EHR implementation 15 C, E, F
H Conduct benefits realization study 10 A-H
  • Draw the PERT or GANTT chart for this implementation based on the information provided.
  • Indicate the critical path on the PERT or GANTT chart.
  • Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.
  • Submit your PERT or GANTT chart for grading.
  • Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.

Rubric

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

10.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Unit 3 Assignment 1 – ONC” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction: In this assignment, we are presented with an example EHR implementation plan and asked to draw a PERT or GANTT chart based on the provided information. We are also asked to indicate the critical path on the chart and submit it in APA format.

Answer:

Activity Duration (days) Predecessor
A Create the EHR vision 5 –
B Identify the planning horizon 10 A
C Obtain buy-in from affected parties 30 B
D Develop a financing and acquisition strategy 10 C
E Develop functional, data, and technical strategies 45 C, F
F Conduct vendor selection 45 D, E
G Plan the EHR implementation 15 C, E, F
H Conduct benefits realization study 10 A, G

Based on the provided information, the PERT chart would look something like this:

[Insert image of PERT chart]

The critical path, which is the longest duration path through the diagram, is A-C-F-E-G-H with a total duration of 150 days. Any delay in this critical path will delay the entire project.

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

New questions

Using the Gestation Demographics SEU datase

This week we are learning about ordinal/categorical, continuous, and dichotomous variables. Using the Gestation Demographics SEU dataset that is located in the tabs at the

Using the Gestation Demographics SEU datase

This week we are learning about ordinal/categorical, continuous, and dichotomous variables. Using the Gestation Demographics SEU dataset that is located in the tabs at the

Policy and Supply and Demand ppt

Policy and Supply and Demand (125 Points) Various programs to increase employment in the healthcare sector have recently been introduced in the Kingdom of Saudi

reply f 1

Under the Health Sector Transformation Program within Saudi Vision 2030, improving the quality and efficiency of health services is a crucial objective. The program aims

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!