Select a research article, other than the articles from your assignments, from the GCU library. Provide an overview of the study and describe the strategy that was used to select the sample from the population. Evaluate the effectiveness of the sampling method selected. Provide support for your answer. Include the article title and permalink in your post.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: In this response, a research article from GCU library will be selected, and an overview of the study will be provided. The sampling strategy used in the study will be described, and an evaluation of its effectiveness will be conducted.
The selected research article is “A cross-sectional study of post-stroke pain prevalence and its associations in Turkish stroke patients” by Ayse Sari et al. The article aimed to investigate the prevalence of pain in stroke patients in Turkey and to identify the factors associated with this pain.
The sampling strategy used in the study was convenience sampling. The researchers recruited participants from two stroke units in Turkey, and the inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of stroke, being conscious and able to communicate verbally. Data was collected from 207 participants aged between 18 and 88 years old.
The effectiveness of the sampling method selected can be evaluated by considering both the strengths and weaknesses of convenience sampling. The main strength is that it is a quick and inexpensive way to recruit participants, making it suitable for studies with limited resources or time constraints. However, convenience sampling can introduce bias into the study as it relies on selecting participants who are easily accessible, willing to participate and available at the time of the study. This may limit the generalizability of the results and may not accurately represent the population of stroke patients in Turkey.
In conclusion, the research article “A cross-sectional study of post-stroke pain prevalence and its associations in Turkish stroke patients” used convenience sampling to recruit participants in Turkey. While this method has strengths such as quick and inexpensive recruitment, its limitations such as bias introduce questions about the generalizability of the findings.
